This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Cover Story: Roundup Quality, meaningful use and EHRs


Tom Darr, M.D., CMO, physician solutions, Ingenix


Physicians have two fundamental goals: to provide excellent, constantly improving patient care; and to help drive the transformation of the healthcare delivery system. The ability to measure the quality of patient care accurately and efficiently is central to each of these goals. An obvious starting place for these capabilities


is the electronic health record, which is an under- utilized technology.


The U.S. federal government is encouraging adoption of EHRs with special Medicare and Medicaid incentive reimbursements to eligible providers who demonstrate meaningful use of the technology. Nearly one year after regulators defined meaningful


use, scores of physician practices are implementing systems they hope will help them improve patient care, manage their workflow more efficiently and control costs.


A focused look shows meaningful-use criteria –


core and menu requirements, each with specific metrics focused on clinical care – are rooted in basic tenets of constant quality improvement. They provide careful, specific direction that adds value now and sets up provider practices for even bigger gains in the future. The goal of the criteria is to help physicians use health IT in a way that meaningfully changes how they engage patients and provide care. Obtaining health intelligence that enables doctors


to improve quality is what meaningful use is all about. It supports the critical goal of transforming what currently is a reactive disease management system to an efficient, proactive health system focused on patient health and well-being, including early detection and even prevention of diseases.


Access control and audit: managing generic accounts


Mac McMillan, CEO, CynergisTek


All certified EHR technologies, in order to meet and demonstrate meaningful use, must have functionality to control access and uniquely identify users to enable effective auditing. When conducting the required risk analysis, many are discovering that generic accounts can create


an unacceptable risk. Generic accounts can include service, training, testing, student and vendor administrator accounts and, in some environments, number into the hundreds. While there is a legitimate purpose for these types of accounts, they should be strictly limited, tightly controlled and audited regularly.


Your access control policy should require, for each account of this type, a validated business need. The ability to create/enable these accounts should be strictly limited to a few individuals. All requests for such access should be reviewed, include a time period required and the identity of the requester/user. A maximum time should be established for the account requested being active, and automated controls should be used to enforce time limits/deactivation. Lastly, the policy, process, controls and actual access should be audited regularly to include those administrator users authorized to create/enable such access. Whether regular user or generic account, all access should be managed to the point that access can be tied back to a specifi c individual. The fi rst step to accomplishing this is conducting a critical review of all accounts and eliminating those that aren’t specifi cally required. Generally, this eliminates many of these accounts and reduces risk. The rest will need to be managed.


Continued on page 16 14 April 2011 HEALTH MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY www.healthmgttech.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36