This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Data Storage

It’s back to the future for storage of PACS images

The concept of a shared central repository has been a staple of information technology for decades. By Michael Warthen


iagnostic imaging is arguably the most important technology ever created for patient diagnosis and treatment. Utilization of more than 700 million tests per year in the United States seems to underscore its universal acceptance. Medical images are typically large fi les, accounting for more than 80 percent of the volume of a patient’s electronic record. Imaging is used to support 60 percent of all patient diagnoses. For clinicians, it is critically important to view not only a current image, but also prior images in order to track the trajectory of the patient’s condition. As imaging technology has evolved, so too has storage technology. Yet do most imaging professionals understand where images are stored and how storage impacts capabilities for image sharing? Traditionally, diagnostic images have been created at a de- partmental level and stored in archives that are proprietary to that department. In most environments, radiology, cardiology and orthopedics each has its own image repository, and images are not shared across archives. The complexity is compounded with some departments having multiple picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) from various vendors. Today, image silos are commonplace. Unfortunately, this model does not support a patient-centric view of im- ages, and it does not support the patient as they traverse the healthcare ecosystem. A sad result of this fragmented imaging infrastructure is that 50 percent of certain scans are estimated to be duplicate tests. The results are often delayed treatment, added costs and unnecessary exposure to radiation. The healthcare industry has a compelling need for image interoperability between departments, sites and enterprises. Today, we are seeing early adopters address this problem with new technology.

Many innovators have pursued a strategy that allows for storage of all diagnostic images in a single, shared repository. The concept of a shared central repository has been a staple of information technology for decades. It has been a funda- mental approach for the collection and sharing of objective patient data for a similar period of time. For today’s approach with image storage, perhaps the time has come for a trip back to the future of information technology strategy. Within healthcare, the centralized imaging repository is

20 August 2011

often referred to as a vendor-neutral archive (VNA). Con- solidation of images from separate proprietary archives into a VNA can provide immediate benefi ts associated with economies of scale, and can also provide an environment for improved access to images. This is possible because images stored within the VNA are morphed into a standard DICOM format, thereby enabling access by virtually any DICOM viewer. In some cases, images that have languished in older archives are now revitalized, becoming available to a much larger and wider clinical audience. Some of today’s images are large in size (many in excess of a gigabyte), and the sheer volume of these large data sets is growing. Fortunately, vendors have anticipated this issue and offer life-cycle management programming to automati- cally address storage retention. Older studies can be readily archived to a less-expensive technology. A VNA can also deliver the benefi t of better performance. Implementation of the VNA across two server confi gurations will improve performance through automated load balancing, and users can be automatically reassigned if one server should fail. This approach offers availability that rivals fault-tolerant architectures. With images being stored in a VNA, individual imaging departments are no longer beholden to legacy challenges when shopping for new PACS systems. The daunting task of migrating old images to a new vendor’s format is non-existent. The cost and time required for this type of image migration has previously stifl ed many attempts to acquire newer, more innovative solutions. With a VNA approach, an organization not only addresses the need to centralize images created within the enterprise, but can also bring in the signifi cant number of studies that originate from outside of the enterprise. Let’s take a brief look at how that can be accomplished. Today, the most popular method of medical image ex- change is accomplished via CD. After an image is created and reviewed by a clinician, a copy of the image and the report is burned into a CD. Often, CDs are given to patients, so they can transport it to the next encounter. (Note: The older IT folks among us will recognize this approach as an updated ver- sion of the time-honored “sneaker net” from the 1980s.)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36