● Thought Leaders: Healthcare Reform Healthcare’s T
Triple Aim How technology is facilitating collaboration among members, providers and payers. By Christopher Mathews, M.D.
oday’s healthcare system is still dominated by a fee-for-service payment system. The resulting ineffi ciencies – high service volume and at times redundant or unnecessary care – are not only hard
to ignore, they are also a detriment to clinical quality, accord- ing to data from Dartmouth Atlas. T e research organization found that regions in which Medicare spending is the highest actually tend to produce worse patient outcomes. Many experts have concluded that the problem stems from
the current uncoordinated and highly fragmented nature of healthcare delivery. To realize the vision of improved quality and lower costs, however, payers, providers and patients must be inspired (and perhaps incentivized) to collaborate in new ways, including sharing appropriate information at all points along the care continuum – a challenge Don Berwick’s “Triple Aim” is designed to address.
The Triple Aim in a nutshell Devised by the former Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) administrator, the Triple Aim emphasizes three objectives: 1. Improve the overall health of the population being served. T is is best accomplished by not only obtain- ing information directly from patients, but also by leveraging both payer and clinical data and analyzing it using sophisticated technologies to risk-stratify the population. T ese tools can help identify which patients require special services, such as complex care management or coordination of services – activities that have traditionally been provided by health plans but will likely shift back to the provider community as they share risk with payers in an accountable care environment.
2. Improve the care experience, which goes beyond simply providing the right type of care. The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) will play a critical role in the care experience by designating a personal provider and care team who are responsible
24 January 2013
Christopher Mathews, M.D., is chief medical officer, ZeOmega. For more on ZeOmega: www.rsleads.com/
for coordinating each patient’s medical and behavioral healthcare activities.
3. Provide the best care possible while lowering the per-capita costs of care over time. While this will be diffi cult to accomplish, applying evidence-based care and eliminating duplicative or unnecessary procedures – with help from information management technolo- gies such as electronic health records (EHRs) – will give the industry the best chance of success.
Challenges, opportunities emerge As healthcare embraces a shared-risk payment system,
payers and providers that exchange cost, utilization, clinical quality, patient experience and provider benchmarking data will achieve the highest outcomes. But it doesn’t end there. To truly impact population health, these constituents must col- laboratively address the broad range of environmental, health literacy, social structure and resource distribution factors by providing individuals with information to support health and wellness and empower patients with chronic illnesses to better understand their conditions and respond in meaningful ways to stabilize or improve their health. T e industry must become more technically sophisticated
by utilizing analytics to help identify important diagnostics and metrics, interrogate data for gaps in care, set health goals and program elements, and integrate delegated care models and chronic care management, among other capabilities. Integrated with the EHR, this information can leverage timely patient data and deliver intelligence at the point of care, where it can be used most eff ectively. But analytics and EHRs cannot solely facilitate change.
To truly realize the benefi ts of a value-based, patient-focused healthcare system, payers, providers and patients must share accountability, become more transparent and utilize informa- tion on a new scale. T is level of collaboration can only be achieved by the right application of incentives, governance structures and technologies – factors being established in the industry today.
HMT HEALTH MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY www.healthmgttech.com
| Page 2
| Page 3
| Page 4
| Page 5
| Page 6
| Page 7
| Page 8
| Page 9
| Page 10
| Page 11
| Page 12
| Page 13
| Page 14
| Page 15
| Page 16
| Page 17
| Page 18
| Page 19
| Page 20
| Page 21
| Page 22
| Page 23
| Page 24
| Page 25
| Page 26
| Page 27
| Page 28