Meaningful Use Let the evolution begin T
Meaningful-use Stage 2 criteria signal a maturing of care coordination. By Justin Barnes
he CMS Stage 2 Notice of Proposed-Rulemaking (NPRM) presents expected criteria from earlier Health Information Technology Policy Commit- tee recommendations already widely published and vetted through internal commentary phases. It is expected that Stage 2 reporting thresholds and percentages will remain largely in place come the Final Rule targeted for August, and should not be decreased via the broader public comment phase next underway like we saw with Stage 1.
Do expect, though, discussion on the requirement that 50 percent of patients are provided access to their health infor- mation online, with 10 percent actually accessing. While the meaningful-use program increases – and shared savings stresses – patient engagement, infl uencing patient behavior and adherence is tricky but doable in terms of signing up for patient portals. Electronic health record (EHR) software providers are widely offering the functionality, but putting a number on patients us- ing portals may be one of the more debatable aspects. Still, we know that practices offering portals are experiencing success- ful adoption by an increasingly mobile and tech-savvy patient population, so I would expect this requirement to remain, even if in this one instance thresholds do not.
Also as expected, Stage 1 menu items – such as incorporat- ing lab results as structured data, generating patient lists by condition and sending patient reminders – have moved to core competencies. For Stage 2, eligible professionals (EPs) are met with 17 core objectives and the selection of three of fi ve menu items for a total of 20; and 18 objectives for hospitals, made up of 16 core and two of four menu items. The proposed rule is touted as a more fl exible approach overall to reporting and certifi cation, and evidence of that can be found in the widely discussed ONC certifi cation provision for batch reporting of eligible professionals in a group practice and other areas expected.
Thresholds in other Stage 1 core objectives are increasing as Stage 2 quality measures, such as CPOE from 30 percent to 60 percent, with the addition of lab and radiology orders along with medications. Electronic prescribing of non-controlled substances rises from 40 percent to 65 percent, and so on. Provisions for 90-day fi rst-year reporting also remain. What’s also new, along with themes such as greater patient engagement, are specifi cs such as the viewing of images as a quality measure that ups the care-coordination bar, albeit right now as a menu item. Also touted as criteria seeking to bring healthcare “across organization and vendor boundaries,” as ONC Director Dr. Farzad Mostashari put it during a HIMSS12 NPRM preview, is a provision for the electronic exchange of care summaries for more than 10 percent of patients, done during
24 June 2012
referrals to other providers and specialists, even to those using different EHR solutions. Also breaking boundaries are
data exchange standards expect- ed in the ONC-proposed rule widely discussed at HIMSS12. These positive steps include the direction being taken to- ward a single transport standard within Nationwide Health In- formation Network (NwHIN) specifi cations for centralized-type exchange, Consolidated CDA (CCDA) for clinical content and support of direct-based exchange through Direct Project protocols.
Justin Barnes is co-chair of the Accountable Care Community of Practice (ACCoP), chairman emeritus of the Electronic Health Records Association (EHR Association) and a vice president at Greenway Medical Technologies. For more on Greenway Medical Technologies: www.rsleads.com/206ht-201
But despite what might sound transitory overall between Stages 1 and 2, make no mistake that by expanding the interoper- ability reach and, in some cases, the complexities of the quality measures – for example, by providing the ability of at least 10 percent of patients to download, view and transmit their health information while also increasing the searchable fi lters patients can use to access it – it will still take time for EPs and EHR providers to master Stage 2 goals.
That is why the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was wise to extend Stage 1 through 2013, and for Stage 2 to begin the following year, in accordance with the consensus of healthcare leaders that the time to prepare for Stage 2, fol- lowed by a faster implementation of Stage 3 by 2016, would be the best scenario. This also allows more EPs, practices and health systems – am- bulatory and hospital – to build their own health IT foundations and take advantage of front-loaded incentive funds. In conjunction, ONC delayed the launch of the permanent EHR certifi cation program to coincide with the Stage 2 Final Rule to keep the program in sync with the new criteria. Expected fl exibility here also includes certifying for just what a special- ist might need, and just for selected menu items along with core objectives and the continuation of complete and module certifi cation.
This is good news overall for our mutual evolution toward a sustainable, smarter and preventive healthcare system fueled by quality EHRs and health information technology. The current focus on CMS patients will provide a further evolution blueprint to all patient populations. The timing is certainly right: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, as the nation’s 70 million baby boomers began reaching age 65 last year, 10,000 people a day are becoming eligible for Medicare benefi ts.
HMT HEALTH MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY www.healthmgttech.com